It seems that every time Apple is close to a new release of Mac OS X, I’m here begging and pleading for a decent upgrade path for recent purchasers of new Macs or the previous Mac OS upgrade box. Of course, Apple doesn’t pay attention and they do what they planned to do anyway.

However, I think my argument becomes ever stronger with each upgrade, for various logical reasons, at least that’s what I believe.

When Mac OS 10.0 became 10.1, of course, the upgrade was essentially free, unless you ordered for shipment direct to your home, in which case a $19.95 “shipping and handling” fee was required. Lest we forget, that fee was the subject of lots of heated arguments about Apple’s alleged profiteering ways.

Regardless, 10.1 was sort of usable, but still slow as the devil, even on the fastest Mac of that era. Come 10.2 and 10.3, and things got a whole lot better. Now, though, you had to pay the full $129 for the upgrade, unless you bought a new Mac after the shipping date was announced — usually at the latest possible moment — in which case you’d be eligible for a special upgrade plan for a brief period of time. How long? A few months or maybe longer, depending on when the next version of Mac OS X was due.

In each case, however, the upgrades were well worth the money because an almost usable operating system became better and — unlike a certain company headquartered in Redmond, WA — faster and more stable. Come 10.4, Mac OS X finally realized its industrial-strength potential, and it became a mainstay for millions of Mac users, both new and converted.

Now it’s fair to say that, despite the promise of over 300 nifty new features in Leopard, it’s not going to be an easy sell. For one thing, just what Macs will Apple leave behind? Officially, the final system requirements have not been announced, and I won’t take any of the comments in rumor sites as gospel. Besides, things are apt to be in flux until Apple begins to take orders.

But it’s fair to say that Leopard’s new graphic eye-candy, such as Core Animation, is apt to require a decently-fast G4 with a powerful graphics card, which probably means that most anything Apple produced in the last four years or so should be compatible.

In the scheme of things, that doesn’t seem too bad, considering that the full Aero 3D interface for Windows Vista barely runs on many of today’s PCs, and far fewer models that are more than a year old.

Apple, however, has said nothing about whether Leopard will be faster, although I would assume they’ll try to make it more stable, particularly the Finder. While the Finder’s new look and features may seem sexier to tout in ads, if it is subject to fewer multithreading slowdowns, that would be just as important, if not more so.

However, does all that, plus Time Machine, Spaces and the other new features, total up to sufficient justification to buy yet another operating system upgrade from Apple at full price? My decision is clear. I will order a family pack the day it goes on sale, and install it on all my Macs as soon as it arrives, although separated by a few hours, to make sure that the setup process works reliably.

But I’m an early adopter, despite the well-known risks. If you depend on your Mac to help you earn a living, you can’t be so cavalier about installing a brand new operating system version, even if Apple makes the installation process nearly foolproof.

What, for example, about the applications you need? Will they be compatible, or crash with abandon or function in a crippled fashion. You probably won’t know until the dust settles, and that may take at least a few days before the Mac troubleshooting sites report the news you need to know.

In the meantime, if I were in the driver’s seat at Apple, I would want to do whatever I could to encourage you to buy that upgrade. If this meant having, say, a longer grace period for recent purchasers of new Macs and Tiger upgrade kits, so be it.

Personally, whether Leopard comes out at the beginning of October, the end of the month, or somewhere in between, I think Apple should begin to accept orders for upgrades right after Labor Day. Yes, I know they apparently plan to unveil new iPods that week, but that’s beside the point.

What’s more, on that day, anyone who buys a new Mac or Tiger box ought to be eligible a free Leopard upgrade for, say, $9.95 a copy. No questions asked, and no installation restrictions, which means they send the same DVD that the full retail purchasers receive.

Of course, as usual, Apple never listens.

Related Articles:

• The iPhone Report: So Where Is That Critical Feature?
• Sometimes Apple Admits It’s Wrong
• Apple’s Prospects: What a Difference a Year Makes!
• Newsletter #449 Preview: Should Apple Take the
  Gloves Off and Go After Microsoft For Real?
• The Snow Leopard Report: Selling Updates Without New Features

Months before the iPhone debuted, Apple was being asked over and over again about the prospects for running third party software on it. But a short time before the hot-selling gadget shipped, Steve Jobs was saying that Apple hadn’t decided how to handle development for the iPhone yet, but that a workable solution might come at a later time.

Not long thereafter, during his WWDC keynote, Jobs said that developers could build Web-based applications using Safari, but there would be no other supported method. Was that meant to close the door permanently, or just to give Apple more time to develop a secure solution?

Now it’s not as if the iPhone is bereft of software. Apple provides plenty of useful tools, including as full-featured a browser as you can expect on such a device. But what about the stuff that hasn’t arrived yet, such as a chatting application and other niceties?

True, some of this stuff is arriving clumsily via the Web-based interface, but it doesn’t integrate so nicely with the iPhone’s features, such as the icon dock. So call it half a loaf, and it’s a sure thing developers are anxious to get something more flexible and far-reaching.

Right now, though, it appears they may not require Apple’s help.

As you recall, during the first few months that Apple built Intel-based Macs, running Windows wasn’t so easy. Microsoft’s VirtualPC wasn’t compatible, and other solutions, from small companies, were barely functional. However, some crackers found a way to patch the firmware to allow installing Windows on another hard drive partition. After some folks won a prize for their work, Apple came out with an official solution. In fact, it arrived so quickly, you just knew it was lying in wait for the appropriate occasion to release.

So how does the Boot Camp example relate to the iPhone? Well, right now, a lot of smart programmers have played with the iPhone’s OS X-based underpinnings and have found ways to take it way beyond the initial Apple design. Just this past weekend, you probably heard that a teenager had devised a way to unlock the iPhone, so you could plug in a SIM card from another network, say T-Mobile in the U.S., or an overseas carrier, and it would be mostly functional. Mostly functional meaning that such features as visual voicemail and YouTube support are lacking. Those features evidently require a connection to the AT&T network, and no doubt other networks that will come to support the iPhone will have to make similar adjustments.

Unfortunately, the method mentioned most often requires opening the phone and fiddling with a soldering tool to accomplish some of its magic. But there are others who tout software-only tools that have the same end result.

But even if you don’t care about cutting the ties that bind the iPhone to AT&T, there are other options that allow you to install third party software. Some allow you to use Mac OS X’s Terminal to send Unix software on over to the iPhone, and others allow you to install more user-friendly chat clients and other stuff.

Speaking of user-friendly, there’s also a site now that offers an installer application that greatly simplifies the process of adding new stuff to your iPhone.

Some of this is reminiscent of the early days of Mac OS X, when the operating system didn’t have a whole lot of features, and even printing was uncertain. But there were plenty of third party applications that unlocked the Unix core to put friendly faces upon different tools. Some were just interface-related, such as allowing you to move the Dock away from its bottom center location. Apple eventually took the hint and allowed you to move it to the left or right side, but placing it on the top or in the corners is still reserved for those system interface tuners — or, if you prefer, a set of commands in the Terminal.

In the same fashion, you can bet Apple is watching the iPhone hacking world very carefully, since they fully expected the scene to play out this way. First, of course, they want to make sure that the hackers aren’t doing something illegal, sufficient to call the legal eagles into action. But even if this stuff is perfectly legal, if lots and lots of iPhone users flock to these newfound toys, I’m really sure that Apple will take the hint and do something about it.

Of course, you’ll no doubt see a fair number of additional applications and system-tuning tools in future iPhone updates. These will be the officially-sanctioned solutions. What’s more, I wouldn’t be surprised if Apple eventually opened the platform and provided a true Software Development Kit (SDK) to members of its developers program.

But providing an SDK doesn’t mean a simple set of applications to create iPhone software. Apple has to test those tools, and provide developer support in some fashion. Those who pay the big bucks for these developer programs are entitled to varying degrees of support, depending on the package they purchase. That means Apple has to allocate engineers to the project, and right now they no doubt have their work cut out for them, finalizing Leopard for the planned October release.

I fully expect that Leopard will, hook or crook, appear before the end of October. What’s more, I fully expect that once Mac OS 10.5 is out the door, Apple will put the final spit and polish on a fully-featured iPhone programmers tool. The hackers may have shown the way, but Apple will eventually deliver the goods.

Related Articles:

• Apple Without Steve Jobs
• The MobileMe Wrecking Ball
• Apple’s Financials: Finding a Way to Turn Good News to Bad
• The Inevitable Comparison: Apple’s Financials and the Health of Steve Jobs
• Newsletter #451 Preview: Will Mac Misconceptions Never End?